[Beowulf] choosing a high-speed interconnect

Chris Sideroff cnsidero at syr.edu
Wed Oct 13 07:55:05 PDT 2004

Thanks for all the excellent replies.  The consensus seems to be carry
out some performance profiling with the current hardware and compare
with a high-speed network cluster.  The former which I am in the process
of doing and the latter which I will try to do.

More specifically, I believe the most important testing for our cluster
will be Fluent's scalability and sensitivity to the network.  The reason
I say this is because there are multiple users (~6-8) running large
Fluent jobs (1-10 million cells) with various solvers, which have
different CPU and memory requirements.  While the in-house code is run
by one person, a lot less frequently and (for other reasons) currently
does not use more than 8 processors.

Following rgb's suggestions, I will be difficult to analyze Fluent at
the code level since we don't have the code but it has some built in
monitors that I can use combined with some Linux tools.  When the time
comes to scale the in-house code to >8 procs we will have greater
flexibility tuning it. BTW, thanks for the parallel programming

I did find some benchmarks on Fluent's website which indicate that
Myrinet definitely scales better than GigE but I still want to carry out
my own benchmarking.  If anyone has any experiences benchmarking their
clusters using Fluent feel free to supply your thoughts.

More information about the Beowulf mailing list