This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C024D2.A5309310 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Jonathan Earle wrote: > > > So, we're still at square 1, that being packets are being > lost due to what > > appears to be an issue surrounding shared interrupts (from > what I can > > determine). > > > > Thoughts as to how to fix this? > > Have you tried the LILO parameter "noapic"? I did that earlier today. No change observed in having apic enabled or disabled. Also using the tulip driver from kernel 2.4.0-test9-pre4, which is v0.9.10, dated Sept 6, 2000. No change. Cheers! Job ------_=_NextPart_001_01C024D2.A5309310 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">RE: [tulip] Problems with IRQs on multiport cards > On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Jonathan Earle wrote:
>
> > So, we're still at square 1, that being packets are being
> lost due to what
> > appears to be an issue surrounding shared interrupts (from
> what I can
> > determine).
> >
> > Thoughts as to how to fix this?
>
> Have you tried the LILO parameter "noapic"?I did that earlier today. No change observed in having apic enabled or disabled.
Also using the tulip driver from kernel 2.4.0-test9-pre4, which is v0.9.10, dated Sept 6, 2000. No change.
Cheers!
------_=_NextPart_001_01C024D2.A5309310--
Job