[Beowulf] RFC: Policy on CFP's being sent to the Beowulf list
prentice.bisbal at rutgers.edu
Tue Mar 18 08:24:15 PDT 2014
I see nothing wrong with having them posted here. It might not be good
practice to have one mailing list subscribe to another, though.
It's upsetting that none of them are relevant to system admins, since I
get the impression that most of the active members of this list are Sys
Admins more so than academic researchers or practicing computational
scientists. I wish there were more conferences and workshops geared
towards system admins, but that's a topic for another thread, and I've
brought that up on the sc-admin mailing list already.
On 03/18/2014 12:06 AM, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Hi folks,
> We've been getting a fair few CFPs coming in from the hpc-announce
> list that the Beowulf list was subscribed to a long time ago (from
> what I can tell). They do get moderated and I've been culling those
> that have no (IMHO) relevance to the world of Beowulf computing.
> I would very much like to solicit peoples feelings on these.
> What do you feel about these CFPs?
> All the best,
> - --
> Christopher Samuel Senior Systems Administrator
> VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative
> Email: samuel at unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545
> http://www.vlsci.org.au/ http://twitter.com/vlsci
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
More information about the Beowulf