Ellis H. Wilson III
ellis at cse.psu.edu
Wed Oct 24 13:25:26 PDT 2012
On 10/24/2012 03:00 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Not at all, in hard sciences the Ph.D's are all the same.
> Of course a Ph.D. in computer science is quite different
> from mandatory Ph.D. and postdoc degrees like in life
> sciences and chemistry.
Feel free to elaborate. Having worked for two years with PhD students
and a few advisors in Temple University's Center for Applied Photonics
Research and now working on my own Comp Sci PhD, I noticed very few
differences between what those guys did in their day to day and what I
now do (aside from the dismal comparison where they got to shoot lasers
all day, while I'm stuck studying how to store a 0 or a 1).
The most notable difference (to me at least) is the frequency of
publication in CS being extraordinarily high relative to most other
sciences, particularly in the engineering-leaning areas
(storage/OS/networking/etc, rather than pure CS theory areas). I just
view this as an artifact of the rapidly changing landscape in CS
compared to other fields, largely in part due to it's relative youth.
But I wouldn't even allow this difference to call a CS PhD "quite
different" -- the basic components are all the same from what I can tell
not having done a physical sciences PhD myself.
Just my (admittedly biased) 2c of course, but I am very interested to be
corrected here if there are some secret society components to a "hard
science" PhD I'm unaware of.
More information about the Beowulf