[Beowulf] PathScale EKOPath goes open source
cbergstrom at pathscale.com
Tue Jun 14 12:44:23 PDT 2011
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:22 PM, David Mathog <mathog at caltech.edu> wrote:
> Mark Hahn wrote:
>>> Thanks! One question, how does EKOPath differ from
>>> the AMD Open64 version?
>>I'm sure the answer is "history", since they are at least in abstract,
>>both forks that have been separately developed for years.
> More useful than the history would be a performance comparison of the
> current versions of the Open64 variants vs. gcc vs. Intel vs. Portland
> compilers. Anybody seen a comparison that is not several years old?
Please don't be mistaken EKOPath != Open64 as already mentioned. (In
some cases the difference could be huge or small.. all depends on how
much our code has diverged)
The EKOPath nightly is available to download if anyone wants to pull
and run benchmarks. More important to us is real customer code
More information about the Beowulf