[Beowulf] Anybody using Redhat HPC Solution in their Beowulf
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Hearns, John john.hearns at mclaren.comFri Oct 22 10:22:49 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Anybody using Redhat HPC Solution in their Beowulf
- Next message: [Beowulf] Anybody using Redhat HPC Solution in their Beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > > > Thanks Michael, > > I am satisfied with Rocks, but my group people wanted something well > supported that means, RHEL instead of CentOS I don't think that follows - other people should comment here. and "some other PAID" > cluster manager instead of Rocks, especially, when we have the budget. > > Somehow, I have not been able to convince my folks that Rocks is a much > better solution than the PAID ones. There are plenty of PAID cluster management stacks out there - as I say go talk to some vendors. Maybe take a trip to Supercomputing? Also give youself time to think about SuSE and SLES (or SLES desktop) on the nodes. Redhat is not the only game in town. (Hint - I've put together many Suse clusters for two cluster integrators) The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this email in error you should not copy it, retransmit it, use it or disclose its contents but should return it to the sender immediately and delete your copy.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Anybody using Redhat HPC Solution in their Beowulf
- Next message: [Beowulf] Anybody using Redhat HPC Solution in their Beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
