[Beowulf] Broadcast - not for HPC - or is it?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bogdan Costescu bcostescu at gmail.comTue Oct 5 08:38:40 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Broadcast - not for HPC - or is it?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Broadcast - not for HPC - or is it?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:40 PM, John Hearns <hearnsj at googlemail.com> wrote: > However this device might be very interesting if you redefine your > parallel processing paradigm. I would say that's always true :-) If you can change the way you do things, then adapting to the most appropriate hardware/software combination makes sense to get the maximum of performance. Wait, this has already happened... and then there was chaos... and then came MPI ;-) > How about problems where you send out identical datasets to (say) a > farm of GPUs. You still need to send point-to-point data forth (what to do with the bulk data) and back (the results). Then you have the big problem of synchronizing the 2 channels: the broadcast one and the point-to-point one. This can come from either GPUs taking different time to finish or from point-to-point communication delays/congestion. And then the efficiency brought by broadcast might just go away... Cheers, Bogdan
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Broadcast - not for HPC - or is it?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Broadcast - not for HPC - or is it?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
