[Beowulf] PXE Booting and Interface Bonding
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David B. Ritch david.ritch at gmail.comThu Mar 18 05:57:39 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: 1000baseT NIC and PXE?
- Next message: [Beowulf] PXE Booting and Interface Bonding
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
What is the best practice for the use of multiple NICs on cluster nodes? I've found that when I enable Etherchannel bonding in out network equipment, PXE booting does not work. It breaks the initial DHCP discover request, presumably because the response may not return to the same NIC. However, bonding the interfaces is a clear win for node availability and for performance. The best solution that I have is to turn off port channels in our network equipment, and use Linux kernel bonding, in balance-alb mode. This provides adaptive load balancing by ARP manipulation. Thanks in advance! David
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: 1000baseT NIC and PXE?
- Next message: [Beowulf] PXE Booting and Interface Bonding
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
