[Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comWed Jun 30 09:17:28 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
- Next message: [Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Hearns, John <john.hearns at mclaren.com> wrote: > Sticking my neck out slightly here, systems with lots of GPUs will score > highly on > the $/flop ratings - but do you get that amount of work under > real-world loads? Sticking my neck out even more, but maybe that problem can be solved by using the actual Teraflops as opposed to peak-teraflops? I'm curious, how good are these GPU based systems when solving something like the Linpack or the SPEC benchmarks? Of course, I'm not saying either of these benchmarks are representative of a "real-world" load. But perhaps they are closer than a peak-teraflops metric. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
- Next message: [Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
