[Beowulf] MPI Persistent Comm Question
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caMon Jun 28 12:40:26 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPI Persistent Comm Question
- Next message: [Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Uhmmm, what is "MPI_Free()"? he probably meant MPI_Request_free > (1) > Call this subroutines 1000 times > ============================= > call MPI_RECV_Init() > call MPI_Send_Init() > call MPI_Startall() > call MPI_Free() > ============================= > > (2) > Call this subroutines 1000 times > =========================== > call MPI_RECV_Init() > call MPI_Send_Init() > call MPI_Startall() > ========================== > call MPI_Free() --------- call it only once at the end. I've never even seen these MPI_Start-related interfaces in use, but MPI_Request_free appears to be callable once per MPI_*_Init. that would argue for pairing as in the first sequence. afaikt, the point of the interface is actually init/start+/free - that is, you set up a persistent send and kick it into action many times. but only free it once.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPI Persistent Comm Question
- Next message: [Beowulf] dollars-per-teraflop : any lists like the Top500?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
