[Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Nifty Tom Mitchell niftyompi at niftyegg.comFri Jun 25 08:54:24 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Next message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:28:15AM -0400, Prentice Bisbal wrote: > > Beowulfers, > > One of my Fortran programmers had to increase the precision of his > program so he switched from REAL*8 to REAL*16 which changes the size of > his variables from 64 bits to 128 bits. The program now takes 32x longer > to run. > I am surprised that it works as support in things like the math lib, log and trig functions could be missing. Which compiler is he using? -- T o m M i t c h e l l Found me a new hat, now what?
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Next message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
