[Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comFri Jun 25 07:51:52 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Next message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Prentice Bisbal wrote: > Beowulfers, > > One of my Fortran programmers had to increase the precision of his > program so he switched from REAL*8 to REAL*16 which changes the size of > his variables from 64 bits to 128 bits. The program now takes 32x longer > to run. > > I'm not an expert on processor archtitecture, etc., but I do know that > once the size of a variable exceeds the size of the processors > registers, things will slow down considerably. Is his 32x performance > degradation in line with this? At least 4x more work is often the case. 32x doesn't sound unreasonable. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics Inc. email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://scalableinformatics.com http://scalableinformatics.com/jackrabbit phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Next message: [Beowulf] Peformance penalty when using 128-bit reals on AMD64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
