[Beowulf] compilers vs mpi?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caTue Jul 20 09:07:32 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] first cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] compilers vs mpi?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all, I'm interested in hearing about experiences with mixing compilers between the application and MPI. that is, I would like to be able to compile MPI (say, OpenMPI) with gcc, and expect it to work correctly with apps compiled with other compilers. I guess I'm reasoning by analogy to normal distro libs. the OpenMPI FAQ has this comment: NOTE: The Open MPI team recommends using a single compiler suite whenever possible. Unexpeced or undefined behavior can occur when you mix compiler suites in unsupported ways (e.g., mixing Fortran 77 and Fortran 90 compilers between different compiler suites is almost guaranteed not to work). and there are complaints elsewhere in the FAQ about f90 bindings. I'd appreciate it if someone could help a humble C/C++/perl hacker understand the issues here... thanks, mark hahn. PS: we have a large and diverse user base, so tend to have to support gcc, intel, pathscale and pgi. we even have people who want to use intel's damned synthetic 128b FP over MPI :(
- Previous message: [Beowulf] first cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] compilers vs mpi?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
