[Beowulf] Parallel file systems
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Sabuj Pattanayek sabujp at gmail.comThu Jan 21 14:51:58 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Parallel file systems
- Next message: [Beowulf] Parallel file systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca> wrote: >> Otherwise, performance is great using infiniband especially to the >> stripes. > > I find that people have greatly differing expectations, so what does "great" > mean to you? The stripe is across 5 machines and I'm getting about 3 times speedup on writes and 2.5 times speedup on reads vs the same tests going directly to the XFS filesystem on a single node. Not hitting anything close to the peak interconnect bandwidth, about 4gbps on writes and 7gbps on reads. > > I would expect to achieve ~90% of the peak bandwidth of the interconnect, > for instance, assuming enough and fast-enough storage targets. this is easy > enough to achieve using Lustre in my experience (albeit I haven't really > tried eg QDR IB.) What about your setup above? What sort of speedup are you getting vs a single node, assuming your (storage) nodes are homogeneous in terms of hardware.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Parallel file systems
- Next message: [Beowulf] Parallel file systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
