[Beowulf] hardware RAID versus mdadm versus LVM-striping
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comTue Jan 19 15:06:27 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] hardware RAID versus mdadm versus LVM-striping
- Next message: [Beowulf] Filesystem benchmarks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Tony Travis <a.travis at abdn.ac.uk> wrote: > I responded to Rahul who started this thread because his requirements seemed > to be similar to mine: i.e. a small-scale DIY Beowulf cluster. In this > context, every penny counts and we do not throw things away until they are > actually dead: Old servers become new compute nodes, and so on. I think that > lot of people reading this list are interested in running small Beowulf > clusters for relatively small projects, like me. I've found the Beowulf list > to be a mine of useful information, but we are not all running huge Beowulf > clusters or supporting them commerically. I don't know about the others on the list, but you describe my situation pretty accurately Tony! :) Small budget, primitive hardware that's rarely retired etc. Sounds familiar. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] hardware RAID versus mdadm versus LVM-striping
- Next message: [Beowulf] Filesystem benchmarks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
