[Beowulf] Spanning Tree Protocol and latency: allowing loops in switching networks for minimizing switch hops
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert Horton robh at dongle.org.ukWed Feb 24 04:12:07 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Spanning Tree Protocol and latency: allowing loops in switching networks for minimizing switch hops
- Next message: [Beowulf] Arima motherboards with SATA2 drives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 13:23 -0600, Rahul Nabar wrote: > In the interest of latency minimum switch hops make sense and for that > loops might sometimes provide the best solution. Using STP won't give you a latency advantage; it just disables some links in a network with loops so you have a single spanning tree. Rob
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Spanning Tree Protocol and latency: allowing loops in switching networks for minimizing switch hops
- Next message: [Beowulf] Arima motherboards with SATA2 drives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
