[Beowulf] NFS share - IO rate
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bogdan Costescu bcostescu at gmail.comThu Apr 22 06:32:28 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NFS share - IO rate
- Next message: [Beowulf] NFS share - IO rate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Henning Fehrmann <henning.fehrmann at aei.mpg.de> wrote: > Doing these tests on clients might give a better picture of the > usability of the cache system. > Measuring the performance on the server wouldn't also take into account the > buffering of the VFS or NFS on the client side. >From what I understand, allowing clients to cache would actually reduce the rates that the server has to deal with. If you just want to measure the server's response, you could mount the NFS shares with the "sync" flag, so that no caching occurs on the clients. Another idea: you could measure the network rates on the server; this would still include the client caching effects - however this would not be very easy to translate into IOP/s. > In the bidding process we specified the read and write rate doing random seeks on the server, > induced and seen by many clients in parallel. OK :-) This still doesn't mention where there measurement takes place... Cheers, Bogdan
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NFS share - IO rate
- Next message: [Beowulf] NFS share - IO rate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
