[Beowulf] QDR InfiniBand interconnect architectures ... approaches ...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Craig Tierney Craig.Tierney at noaa.govThu Apr 8 11:42:49 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] QDR InfiniBand interconnect architectures ... approaches ...
- Next message: [Beowulf] QDR InfiniBand interconnect architectures ... approaches ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
richard.walsh at comcast.net wrote: > > All, > > > What are the approaches and experiences of people interconnecting > clusters of more than128 compute nodes with QDR InfiniBand technology? > Are people directly connecting to chassis-sized switches? Using multi-tiered > approaches which combine 36-port leaf switches? What are your experiences? > What products seem to be living up to expectations? > > > I am looking for some real world feedback before making a decision on > architecture and vendor. > > We have been telling our vendors to design a multi-level tree using 36 port switches that provides approximately 70% bisection bandwidth. On a 448 node Nehalem cluster, this has worked well (weather, hurricane, and some climate modeling). This design (15 up/21 down) allows us to scale the system to 714 nodes. Craig > Thanks, > > > rbw > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] QDR InfiniBand interconnect architectures ... approaches ...
- Next message: [Beowulf] QDR InfiniBand interconnect architectures ... approaches ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
