[Beowulf] QDR InfiniBand interconnect architectures ... approaches ...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comThu Apr 8 11:14:11 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] QDR InfiniBand interconnect architectures ... approaches ...
- Next message: [Beowulf] QDR InfiniBand interconnect architectures ... approaches ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 04:13:21PM +0000, richard.walsh at comcast.net wrote: > > What are the approaches and experiences of people interconnecting > clusters of more than128 compute nodes with QDR InfiniBand technology? > Are people directly connecting to chassis-sized switches? Using multi-tiered > approaches which combine 36-port leaf switches? I would expect everyone to use a chassis at that size, because it's cheaper than having more cables. That was true on day 1 with IB, the only question is "are the switch vendors charging too high of a price for big switches?" > I am looking for some real world feedback before making a decision on > architecture and vendor. Hopefully you're planning on benchmarking your own app -- both the HCAs and the switch silicon have considerably different application- dependent performance characteristics between QLogic and Mellanox silicon. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] QDR InfiniBand interconnect architectures ... approaches ...
- Next message: [Beowulf] QDR InfiniBand interconnect architectures ... approaches ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
