[Beowulf] AMD 6100 vs Intel 5600
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.eduThu Apr 1 10:30:34 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] AMD 6100 vs Intel 5600
- Next message: [Beowulf] AMD 6100 vs Intel 5600
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 04/01/2010 12:59 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote: > I'm not convinced, is the number of cores more important that agg. performance > and price? Also, if you turn on SMT/HT on a 6-core westmere it may appear > very similar to a 12-core Magnycour (performance, appearance, price, ...). I'd be interested in the details if it works out that way. I've seen HT help on real codes on the order of 10-20%. I've not seen it help anywhere close to a factor of 2. The spec results posted use hypethreading and still showed a substantial Magnycour advantage. The main advantage I've seen is that a dual socket intel node with 2 sockets can handle 16 jobs with 1.5G each or 8 jobs with 3.0 GB each without a significant throughput penalty. On AMD systems you lose approximately half the throughput. > My experience is that in HPC it always boils down to price/performance and > that would in my eyes make apples out of Magnycour and Westmere. Agreed. Large number of sockets or large NUMA systems seem to be more specialized tools because of their higher cost. Justified by some applications, but not my general HPC workloads.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] AMD 6100 vs Intel 5600
- Next message: [Beowulf] AMD 6100 vs Intel 5600
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
