[Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comWed Sep 30 08:34:16 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Cutts wrote: > > On 30 Sep 2009, at 2:23 pm, Rahul Nabar wrote: > >> I like the shared socket approach. Building a separate IPMI network >> seems a lot of extra wiring to me. Admittedly the IPMI switches can be >> configured to be dirt cheap but it still feels like building a extra >> tiny road for one car a day when a huge highway with spare capacity >> exists right next door carrying thousands of cars. (Ok, cheesy >> analogy!) > > Yes, but the tiny road is still useable by the emergency services when > there's been a pileup on the main cariageway, and there are wreckage and > bodies everywhere! If this is happening in your computer room, you have bigger issues to worry about than crash carts ... just saying ... :) > > Tim > > -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics Inc. email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://scalableinformatics.com http://scalableinformatics.com/jackrabbit phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room: full cluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
