[Beowulf] posting bonnie++ stats from our cluster: any comments about my I/O performance stats?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comMon Sep 28 15:02:14 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] posting bonnie++ stats from our cluster: any comments about my I/O performance stats?
- Next message: [Beowulf] posting bonnie++ stats from our cluster: any comments about my I/O performance stats?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Brian McNally <bmcnally at u.washington.edu> wrote: > I'd second testing to make sure bonding/trunking is working before you base > other performance numbers on it. You may also want to consider different > bonding modes if you have problems with balancing the traffic out. See: > > /usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-<ver>/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt Thanks Brian! I'll double check but I have tested in the past to make sure bonding is multiplying my traffic B/W. I am using bonding in the Adaptive Load Balancing (ALB) mode. I forget what tool I had used but I believe it was indeed netperf. Of course the advantage only comes when talking to two+ peers at the same time. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] posting bonnie++ stats from our cluster: any comments about my I/O performance stats?
- Next message: [Beowulf] posting bonnie++ stats from our cluster: any comments about my I/O performance stats?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
