Fwd: [Beowulf] What is best OS for GRID or clusters?
jellogum at gmail.com
Sun Sep 27 09:55:08 PDT 2009
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jeremy Baker <jellogum at gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] What is best OS for GRID or clusters?
To: Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca>
Sun Solaris Express Developer Edition, w/ Sun Studio compilers, Netbeans ...
is a 4G DVD I obtained in the pulp Linux User & Developer (mag issue 76).
For legacy hardware, it would work.
Time is finite for me, I must pick a system, and presently I have plans to
focus on GCC and BSD Linux, that is until a reasonable argument is made to
switch, if there is a reason.
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca> wrote:
> Any significant reason to use SOLARIS over a Linux distro for development
> in the absence of any other info, it would be absurd to choose solaris.
> solaris is merely yet another proprietary version of unix, used by a
> vanishingly small fraction of people. generally only those with a fetish
> for "commercial support". experienced users know that "support" is always
> far short of the PhB dream of a warm cocoon of "everything just
> works or someone else fixes it instantly".
> Does the same C/C++ file compile well on both systems? If there are
> it depends on the code. any code can be non-portable, but any portable
> code will (by definition) compile and run on either OS.
> differences where can I find suggested reading material on the topic?
> well, the beowulf list isn't a good place to start. linux is the defacto
> standard unix; solaris is merely something you can get from sun. there are
> some bits of software which sun still provides only on solaris - the only
> possible rational reason to use solaris is to get those (ZFS is really the
> only one considered significant.)
337 College Hill
337 College Hill
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Beowulf