[Beowulf] posting bonnie++ stats from our cluster: any comments about my I/O performance stats?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comFri Sep 25 11:47:59 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] posting bonnie++ stats from our cluster: any comments about my I/O performance stats?
- Next message: [Beowulf] posting bonnie++ stats from our cluster: any comments about my I/O performance stats?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Michael Will <mwill at penguincomputing.com> wrote: > By the way, if you have to work through a purchasing departement that only > looks at the cheapest price, but > you want to go with a specific vendor because of the superior solution and > technical expertise, then you can Thanks! I guess I have not faced the problem that you describe (yet). My problem is still easier. It is convincing *myself* which is the right solution. Or more of " how to compare various vendor solutions?" It was easy for the compute nodes. But the storage and backbone are still not clear (to me). One of the reasons is that it is easy to buy several compute nodes piecewise and test the actual codes. But how does one simulate scaleup for estimating performance of switches and backbone. Of course, over the past weeks several useful suggestions have been offered but I am still not sure. Perhaps I am just not doing my homework! :) -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] posting bonnie++ stats from our cluster: any comments about my I/O performance stats?
- Next message: [Beowulf] posting bonnie++ stats from our cluster: any comments about my I/O performance stats?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
