[Beowulf] Facebook: Yes, We Need 100-GigE
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Hearns, John john.hearns at mclaren.comThu Sep 24 01:54:26 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Facebook: Yes, We Need 100-GigE
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nhalem EX
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=181899 Facebook: Yes, We Need 100-GigE September 16, 2009 | Craig Matsumoto | Comments (13) It's become cliché to say that companies like Facebook would use 100-Gbit/s Ethernet right now if they had it. But it helps when someone from Facebook actually shows up and hammers on that point. "Hold on there Bald Eagle" Isn't this a case of every problem being a nail if you only have a hammer? What is all this bandwidth being USED for? Surely on the Beowulf list we should be looking at this from the angle of parallel processing - if your huge central pipe is maxed out, then maybe distributing the problem among many smaller, cheaper pipes (and processing units) is the way to go. The contents of this email are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this email in error you should not copy it, retransmit it, use it or disclose its contents but should return it to the sender immediately and delete your copy.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Facebook: Yes, We Need 100-GigE
- Next message: [Beowulf] Nhalem EX
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
