[Beowulf] Re: switching capacity terminology confusion
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comFri Sep 18 05:11:41 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: switching capacity terminology confusion
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: switching capacity terminology confusion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Gerry Creager <gerry.creager at tamu.edu> wrote: > > With the POSSIBLE exception of the newer Nexus line from Cisco, I can't > think of a reason I'd put a Cisco-labeled switch in my data center... except > for a Linksys for non-critical applications. Nexus is expensive though! They tell me that it approaches latencies of Infiniband and is close to the operations of a lossless switch. That's what I got from their sales guy. But again, we weren't ready to pay the premium. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: switching capacity terminology confusion
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: switching capacity terminology confusion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
