[Beowulf] how large can we go with 1GB Ethernet? / Re: how large of an installation have people used NFS, with?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comWed Sep 9 15:24:57 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] how large can we go with 1GB Ethernet? / Re: how large of an installation have people used NFS, with?
- Next message: [Beowulf] how large can we go with 1GB Ethernet? / Re: how large of an installation have people used NFS, with?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:23:30PM -0400, psc wrote: > I wonder what would be the sensible biggest cluster possible based on > 1GB Ethernet network. People build multi-thousand node clusters like that. In the HPC world, oil-and-gas and some other industrial applications don't need more than 1 gbit. Of couse these days they use 10 gbit to connect 1gbit switches. In the non-HPC world, companies with huge datacenters often have thousands to many thousands of nodes in a single layer-2 network with 1gbit to the nodes. That's limited only by the size of the mac addr tables in your switches. When you have to split your cluster into layer-3 chunks, the bandwidth between chunks sucks, but most clusters in the non-HPC world are limited to 2000-4000 nodes anyway by various software limitations. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] how large can we go with 1GB Ethernet? / Re: how large of an installation have people used NFS, with?
- Next message: [Beowulf] how large can we go with 1GB Ethernet? / Re: how large of an installation have people used NFS, with?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
