[Beowulf] how large of an installation have people used NFS with? would 300 mounts kill performance?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comWed Sep 9 11:52:18 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] how large of an installation have people used NFS with? would 300 mounts kill performance?
- Next message: [Beowulf] how large of an installation have people used NFS with? would 300 mounts kill performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rahul Nabar wrote: > If not NFS then Lustre etc options do exist. But the more I read about > those the more I am convinced that those open another big can of > worms. Besides, if NFS would work I do not want to switch. You might also want to look at GlusterFS. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics Inc. email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://scalableinformatics.com http://scalableinformatics.com/jackrabbit phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] how large of an installation have people used NFS with? would 300 mounts kill performance?
- Next message: [Beowulf] how large of an installation have people used NFS with? would 300 mounts kill performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
