[Beowulf] petabyte for $117k
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.eduWed Sep 2 13:28:18 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] petabyte for $117k
- Next message: [Beowulf] Vendor terms and conditions for a typical Beouwulf expansion contract
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > As for people's vibrations comments: they own a bunch of them and they > work... For now, I've seen similar setups last 6-12 months before a drive drops, then a rebuild triggers drop #2. > but that is only a single point of evidence and not a history > of working with a variety of disks models over time. The guy said he > could write a whole post about vibration; I think it would be very > interesting. Indeed, very. If they were significantly cheaper than a better design I could see the justification. But for $0.11 vs $0.13 per GB I don't see it. Certainly as a potential customer for N copies of my data I'd certainly rather pay $0.13 + overhead for reliable (ecc + raid edition drives) storage then $0.11 + overhead for unreliable storage (no ecc and consumer drives) for my precious bits. It's especially scary since they don't seem to have any replication, or at least that replication is incompatible with their statement "In rough terms, every time one of our customers buys a hard drive, Backblaze needs another hard drive."
- Previous message: [Beowulf] petabyte for $117k
- Next message: [Beowulf] Vendor terms and conditions for a typical Beouwulf expansion contract
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
