[Beowulf] petabyte for $117k
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bruno Coutinho coutinho at dcc.ufmg.brWed Sep 2 10:43:46 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] petabyte for $117k
- Next message: [Beowulf] petabyte for $117k
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/9/2 Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 04:28:10PM -0700, Bill Broadley wrote: > > > I'm very curious to hear how they are in production. I've had vibration > of > > My thoughts exactly. > > > large sets of drives basically render the consumer drives useless. > Timeouts, > > highly variable performance, drives constantly dropping out of raids. It > > became especially fun when the heavy I/O of a rebuild knocks additional > drives > > out of the array. > > Also my experience down to a T. > > > I'd also worry that running the consumer drives well out of spec (both in > duty > > cycle and vibration) might significantly shorten their lives. > > > > Are the 7200.11 1.5TB seagate's particularly vibration resistant? > > No. They're awful, as the entire 7200.11 line (I've had failures > in 750 GByte, 1 TByte, 1.5 TByte, everywhere, even with reasonably > small drive populations). > > According to this site, the main difference between Seagate desktop and ES series is that the latter are more vibration resistant. http://techreport.com/articles.x/10748 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20090902/1f32c468/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] petabyte for $117k
- Next message: [Beowulf] petabyte for $117k
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
