[Beowulf] Mature open source hierarchical storage management
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Nifty Tom Mitchell niftyompi at niftyegg.comSun Oct 25 16:53:56 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Mature open source hierarchical storage management
- Next message: [Beowulf] Mature open source hierarchical storage management
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:12:11PM +1100, Carl Thomas wrote: > > HI all, > We are currently in the midst of planning a major refresh of our existing > HPC cluster. > It is expected that our storage will consist of a combination of fast > fibre channel and SATA based disk and we would like to implement a system > whereby user files are automatically migrated to and from slow storage > depending on frequency of usage. Initial investigations seem to indicate > that larger commercial�hierarchical storage management systems vastly exceed our budget. > > Is there any mature open source alternatives out there? How are other organisations dealing with transparently presenting different tiers of storage to non technical scientists? > Just curious -- how large and how big are the deltas in the hierarchy? I ask because the new generation of 2TB SATA disks appear to be establishing the groundwork for a list of new storage options including cluster file systems that run circles around NFS and large storage RAIDS.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Mature open source hierarchical storage management
- Next message: [Beowulf] Mature open source hierarchical storage management
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
