[Beowulf] Re: Any industry-standards that allow automated BIOS modifications and dumping? IPMI cannot do it, can it?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comThu Oct 22 15:00:35 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Any industry-standards that allow automated BIOS modifications and dumping? IPMI cannot do it, can it?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Any industry-standards that allow automated BIOS modifications and dumping? IPMI cannot do it, can it?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > mobo vendors, but it includes licensed stuff, and also secret > > workarounds to hardware bugs in lots of devices. > > Why does a workaround to a hardware bug have to be secret? Just > curious.....Aren't hardware bugs published in errata regularly? It's not that it has to be a secret, it's that vendors don't want the public to know. Ideally they'd all appear in errata. In practice, vendors tell some of the bugs only to M$ and BIOS vendors under NDA. And then Linux people wonder why the device doesn't work very well under Linux. Some devices don't have any public errata, some have partial lists, for some you think the public list is complete, but... -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Any industry-standards that allow automated BIOS modifications and dumping? IPMI cannot do it, can it?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Any industry-standards that allow automated BIOS modifications and dumping? IPMI cannot do it, can it?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
