[Beowulf] Disappointing floating point performance for X5560 versus SPECmarks?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caTue Oct 13 13:19:55 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Disappointing floating point performance for X5560 versus SPECmarks?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Home Beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> However, our own benchmarking using nbench, unixbench, and a home-grown > utility (twobod) all show that any differences are attributed to clock speed. do you have any sense for whether these are entirely in-cache benchmarks? that's the most obvious explanation. nehalem is all about the new memory interface - the cores are basically just core2's (with HT added and some smallish tweaks to caches, etc). basically 2x 2-wide GP flops/cycle/core.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Disappointing floating point performance for X5560 versus SPECmarks?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Home Beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
