[Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns hearnsj at googlemail.comThu Oct 8 22:54:44 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/10/8 Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: > You haven't mentioned the other things you can use IPMI for. > > 1) Console logging. Your machine just crashed. No clue in > /var/log/messages. "I wonder if it printed something on the console?" > Answer: ipmi and conman (available in an rpm in Red Hat distros). > > 2) Monitoring. Temp, fan speeds, power supply state, events. Answers > the "why is the little red light on the front of the case lit?" > question. At the risk of getting a reputation in these parts, both come as standard on the SGI ICE cluster. Console logging via IPMI/conman on the rack leader for all nodes, which is then mounted across to the admin node. Temp, fan speed etc. logged on the rack leaders and reported via ESP monitoring. Ganglia implemented too.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: recommendation on crash cart for a cluster room:fullcluster KVM is not an option I suppose?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
