[Beowulf] scheduler recommendations for a HPC cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jesse Becker beckerjes at mail.nih.govWed Oct 7 19:24:48 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] scheduler recommendations for a HPC cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] scheduler recommendations for a HPC cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:22:14PM -0400, Rahul Nabar wrote: >Any strong / weak recommendations for / against schedulers? For a long I'm a happy SGE user, and have been for 7+ years. A basic install does simple FIFO queuing (just like Torque, from what I've heard). It is fairly easy to add various "fairness" mechanisms to make sure that a single user doesn't take over the cluster, as well as define what you thing "fair" means. SGE can handle both interactive and non-interactive jobs, manage basic job dependencies, and has a more advanced interface through the DRMAA API. SGE also provides resource management and load balancing (e.g. handling software licenses and making sure compute nodes aren't oversubscribed). There's a wealth of documentation, a very helpful mailing list, active development, and responsive developers. Oh, and it's free (as in beer and speech), although I think you can throw money at Sun for support if you want. -- Jesse Becker NHGRI Linux support (Digicon Contractor)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] scheduler recommendations for a HPC cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] scheduler recommendations for a HPC cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
