[Beowulf] Best Practices SOL vs Cyclades ACS
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comWed Oct 7 18:36:04 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Best Practices SOL vs Cyclades ACS
- Next message: [Beowulf] diskless how to
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rich Sudlow wrote: > In the past we've used cyclades console servers for serial > interfaces into our cluster nodes. > > We're replacing 360 nodes which couldn't do SOL with 360 > which could. > > Now that we can do SOL is that a better to use that instead of the > Cyclades? > > Thoughts? Every now and then IPMI gets wedged. We have seen it on all IPMI stacks. When IPMI gets wedged, SOL stops working. I recommend redundant administrative pathways ... make sure you can get to and control the machine in the event of a problem. Some pathways may not be as cost effective at scale than others. > > Rich > > -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics, Inc. email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://scalableinformatics.com http://scalableinformatics.com/jackrabbit phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Best Practices SOL vs Cyclades ACS
- Next message: [Beowulf] diskless how to
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
