[Beowulf] CentOS plus Fedora kernel?
Michael H. Frese
Michael.Frese at NumerEx-LLC.com
Wed Nov 25 16:31:41 PST 2009
At 01:14 PM 11/25/2009, Andrew Shewmaker wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:37:01PM +0100, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
> >> A much newer kernel from Fedora usually requires newer utils as well
> > Yeah, last time I did this I didn't rpm-ize the kernel, and that saved
> > me quite a bit of work. I snagged the .config file out of Fedora, but
> > didn't grab any patches.
> > Since you guys seem determined to speculate about what feature I need,
> > it's the new scheduler, CFS, which appeared in 2.6.23.
>In case you were considering the 2.6.25 kernel that shipped with Fedora 9,
>I recommend against it. I know there have been studies showing that it is
>a nice kernel with regard to low interrupt noise, but I have regularly seen it
>lock up while running MPI apps. 2.6.27 hasn't had the same issue, but we
>have seen 10-20% regression in IP network performance.
I think I'm seeing 2.6.23 lockup with a big MPI app, but I wouldn't
have guessed the connection without Andrew's message.
We've been moving away from Fedora toward CentOS 5.4, and thus, back
to 2.6.18, but apparently not fast enough.
More information about the Beowulf