[Beowulf] CentOS plus Fedora kernel?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Shewmaker agshew at gmail.comWed Nov 25 12:14:01 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] CentOS plus Fedora kernel?
- Next message: [Beowulf] CentOS plus Fedora kernel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:37:01PM +0100, Bogdan Costescu wrote: > >> A much newer kernel from Fedora usually requires newer utils as well > > Yeah, last time I did this I didn't rpm-ize the kernel, and that saved > me quite a bit of work. I snagged the .config file out of Fedora, but > didn't grab any patches. > > Since you guys seem determined to speculate about what feature I need, > it's the new scheduler, CFS, which appeared in 2.6.23. In case you were considering the 2.6.25 kernel that shipped with Fedora 9, I recommend against it. I know there have been studies showing that it is a nice kernel with regard to low interrupt noise, but I have regularly seen it lock up while running MPI apps. 2.6.27 hasn't had the same issue, but we have seen 10-20% regression in IP network performance. -- Andrew Shewmaker
- Previous message: [Beowulf] CentOS plus Fedora kernel?
- Next message: [Beowulf] CentOS plus Fedora kernel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
