[Beowulf] UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) for the BIOS
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David N. Lombard dnlombar at ichips.intel.comTue Nov 24 08:34:11 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) for the BIOS
- Next message: [Beowulf] mpd ..failed ..!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 04:47:42PM -0800, Rahul Nabar wrote: > Has anyone tried out UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) in > the BIOS? The new servers I am buying come with this option in the > BIOS. Out of curiosity I googled it up. > > I am not sure if there were any HPC implications of this and wanted to > double check before I switched to this from my conventional > plain-vanilla BIOS. Any sort of "industry standard" always sounds good > but I thought it safer to check on the group first.... Just catching up w/ email. SC derails most normal work... I use UEFI, but, well, that shouldn't be a large surprise. elilo is the boot loader, it's written in C, and quite easy to manage. I actually use an abridged version of elilo to load a Linux kernel/initrd that provides my booting support. You can, for example, put the kernel/initrd normally PXE booted directly on the node and get into that w/o having to deal with PXE, TFTP, et al. Once you get that far, you can then carefully tune the kernel/initrd to exquisitely control the boot process. -- David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) for the BIOS
- Next message: [Beowulf] mpd ..failed ..!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
