[Beowulf] How Would You Test Infiniband in New Cluster?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.eduTue Nov 17 19:18:58 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] How Would You Test Infiniband in New Cluster?
- Next message: [Beowulf] The Limulus Case
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jon Forrest wrote: > I had said "I believe these are with IB." > Now I'm not so sure. I just did a The performance numbers you showed from relay and mpi_nxnlatbw are definitely much faster than GigE. Unless it's multiple copies running on a single machine (thus printing the hostname). Assuming that it was actually using the interconnect (not multiple copies running on a single machine) > > "ifconfig ib0" I suspect this is for TCPIP over ib, and doesn't show MPI traffic. You didn't mention which controllers do you have? I suspect that there is a tool to show the various counters on the HCA, let alone on the switch side. > I'll have to figure out how to force IB when > using OpenMPI. Looks like IB to me, might want to do the reverse to see the real differential, I find it very handy for cost justifying IB on future clusters based on real application performance.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] How Would You Test Infiniband in New Cluster?
- Next message: [Beowulf] The Limulus Case
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
