[Beowulf] Cluster of Linux and Windows
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caFri Nov 13 09:29:35 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cluster of Linux and Windows
- Next message: [Beowulf] UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) for the BIOS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I am used to work with Arch Linux. What do you think about it? the distro is basically irrelevant. clustering is just a matter of your apps, middleware like mpi (may or may not be provided by the cluster), probably a shared filesystem, working kernel, network stack, job-launch mechanism. distros are mainly about desktop gunk that is completely irrelevant to clusters. > And finnaly, I would like to know if Is it possible to get a Cluster Working > with a Server on Arch Linux and the nodes Windows. sure, but why? windows is generally inferior as an OS platform, so I would stay away unless you actually require your apps to run under windows. (remember that linux can use windows storage and authentication just fine.) > Or even better the nodes without a defined SO. SO=Significant Other? oh, maybe "OS". generally, you want to minimize the number of things that can go wrong in your system. using uniform OS on nodes/servers is a good start. but sure, there's no reason you can't run a cluster where every node is a different OS. they simply need to agree on the network protocol (which doesn't have to be MPI - in fact, using something more SOA-like might help if the nodes are heterogenous)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cluster of Linux and Windows
- Next message: [Beowulf] UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) for the BIOS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
