[Beowulf] Fortran Array size question
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
"C. Bergström" cbergstrom at pathscale.comTue Nov 3 17:27:22 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question
- Next message: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael H. Frese wrote: > I think Gus has it right. Your two arrays are 200 million floating > point words each, perhaps 8 bytes per word, and therefore are > approximately about 3 gigabytes total. > > That's too big for the default 'small' memory model. > > Certainly, there are no limits to array sizes in Fortran. If you need a 64bit Fortran compiler ping me off list. (PathScale not iFort of course) I was working with some extremely large code a few months ago and one of our engineers could probably polish up my patch and send out test binaries to anyone interested. All we would ask for in this specific case is feedback. <marketing>Our performance on floating point code should be better than Intel's. If you find to the contrary that's a bug we're happy to address</marketing> ./C
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question
- Next message: [Beowulf] Fortran Array size question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
