[Beowulf] re: open64 from AMD (was newbie)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rayson Ho raysonlogin at gmail.comWed May 20 10:01:28 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] re: open64 from AMD (was newbie)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: newbie
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca> wrote: >> I had no idea that the MIPSPro compiler had been resurrected so I was >> interested to hear about the AMD effort. Yeah, PathScale ported Open64 to x86 & AMD64 a few years ago... And besides IA64 and x64, China (Chinese Academy of Sciences) ported Open64 to PowerPC & Loongson (the MIPS processor developed by China): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loongson http://www.capsl.udel.edu/conferences/open64/2009/ > me too, but it brings up a thorny topic: how to compare the performance > of different compilers? the obvious "run it on your code and see" is not > helpful in my case, since my goal is to have a good choice for a large > shared HPC organization (several thousand users currently.) It's hard, and even comparing the performance of the "same" compiler but different versions can be hard. Sometimes adding a new optimization can slow down the overall SPEC mark, and new optimizations with each other, with speedups masking slowdowns. Making sure that a functionally correct compiler is already hard enough, and I think it is almost impossible to get a compiler with no performance regressions. This is especially true when there are multiple components (different front-ends, optimiziers, backends, and at the same time supporting multiple processor micro-architectures), and keep in mind that you (usually) get at least one new development build each week for each component, and each team also has a large number of developers checking in code at the same time! > how about microbenchmarks? codes like polyhedron might be reasonable > to start with. HPCC? byte unix benchmarks? See also: http://developer.amd.com/cpu/open64/AppsAndLibraries/Pages/default.aspx Rayson > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] re: open64 from AMD (was newbie)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: newbie
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
