[Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comSat May 16 18:37:14 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:54:58AM +0100, Tiago Marques wrote: > I don't think that GCC compilers are that well optimized for Opterons, which > may be a reason why some AMD clusters are using Pathscale compilers. gcc on Opteron is, relatively speaking, one of the best gcc ports. When PathScale ported back to MIPS, they were able to beat gcc on that processor by a much higher margin than on Opteron or Intel. PathScale was always really good on VASP, by the way, I know we clobbered Intel's compiler on Opteron, don't recall if we were better than Intel's compiler on Intel's chips. -- greg who used to work for PathScale, way back when
- Previous message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Next message: [Beowulf] recommendations for cluster upgrades
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
