[Beowulf] Should I go for diskless or not?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jonathan Aquilina eagles051387 at gmail.comThu May 14 21:25:28 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Should I go for diskless or not?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Should I go for diskless or not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
also dont forget the more nodes you have booting off the master the more access time your gonna need to do a pxe boot from the one master node. if you plan on splitting things up once you notice a degredation in booting performance and putting a certain number of nodes on each master node that should help to disipate the pxe booting time needed to boot all the nodes. On 5/13/09, Dr Cool Santa <drcoolsanta at gmail.com> wrote: > I have a cluster of identical computers. We are planning to add more nodes > later. I was thinking whether I should go the diskless nodes way or not? > Diskless nodes seems as a really exciting, interesting and good option, > however when I did it I needed to troubleshoot a lot. I did fix it up, but I > had to redo the filesystem, but the past experiences didn't make much of a > difference. I still need to fix up everything, I kinda need your help to > decide. > Also, performance wise, I was thinking that diskless is not a good option, > and since performance matters . . . > Can somebody outline the pros and cons of each or just give me thier > opinion. > -- Jonathan Aquilina
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Should I go for diskless or not?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Should I go for diskless or not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
