[Beowulf] evaluating FLOPS capacity of our cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Ashley Pittman ashley at pittman.co.ukMon May 11 15:06:59 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] evaluating FLOPS capacity of our cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] evaluating FLOPS capacity of our cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 15:09 -0400, Gus Correa wrote: > Mark Hahn wrote: > I haven't checked the Top500 list in detail, > but I think you are right about 80% being fairly high. > (For big clusters perhaps?). Other way around, maintaining a high efficiency rating at large node counts is a very difficult problem so larger clusters tend to have smaller values. > In the original email I mentioned that Roadrunner (top500 1st), > has Rmax/Rpeak ~= 76%. > > However, without any particular expertise or too much effort, > I got 83.4% Rmax here. :) > I was happy with that number, > until somebody in the OpenMPI list told me that > "anything below 85%" needs improvement. :( At 24 nodes that's probably a reasonable statement. Ashley,
- Previous message: [Beowulf] evaluating FLOPS capacity of our cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] evaluating FLOPS capacity of our cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
