Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] evaluating FLOPS capacity of our cluster

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Tom Elken tom.elken at qlogic.com
Mon May 11 13:52:18 PDT 2009


> On Behalf Of Rahul Nabar
> 
> Rmax/Rpeak= 0.83 seems a good guess based on one very similar system
> on the Top500.
> 
> Thus I come up with a number of around 1.34 TeraFLOPS for my cluster
> of 24 servers.  Does the value seem reasonable ballpark? Nothing too
> accurate but I do not want to be an order of magnitude off. [maybe  a
> decimal mistake in math! ]

You're in the right ballpark.  I recently got 0.245 Tflops on HPL on a 4-node version of what you have (with Goto BLAS), so 6x that # is in the same ballpark as your 1.34 TF/s estimate.  My CPUs were 2.3 GHz Opteron 2356 instead of your 2.2 GHz.  

Greg is also right on the memory size being a factor allowing larger N to be used for HPL.  I used a pretty small N on this HPL run since we were running it as part of a  HPC Challenge suite run, and a smaller N can be better for PTRANS if you are interested in the non-HPL parts of HPCC (as I was).

> All 64 bit machines with a dual channel
> bonded Gigabit ethernet interconnect. AMD Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm)
> Processor 2354.

As others have said, 50% is a more likely HPL efficiency for a large GigE cluster, but with your smallish cluster (24 nodes) and bonded channels, you would probably get closer to 80% than 50%.

-Tom

> 
> 
> PS.  The Athelon was my typo, earlier sorry!
> 
> --
> Rahul
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin
> Computing
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf




More information about the Beowulf mailing list