[Beowulf] evaluating FLOPS capacity of our cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comMon May 11 12:52:50 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] evaluating FLOPS capacity of our cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] evaluating FLOPS capacity of our cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Gus Correa <gus at ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote: > Of course even the HPL Rmax is > not likely to be reached by a real application, > with I/O, etc, etc. > Rahul and I may be better off testing Rmax with our real > programs. > I do know that these benchmarks can be somewhat unrealistic and the real test is the actual application that you want to run. I already have those timed-benchmarks for my particular computational chemistry code and more specifically with a job representative of what we might consider "typical" for computations on our cluster. Yet, while speaking to larger audiences sometimes FLOPS becomes a commonly reported and understood benchmark and hence my desire to compute it. That is another reason why the exact-FLOPS capacity is of not so much interest to me as a approximate value. -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] evaluating FLOPS capacity of our cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] evaluating FLOPS capacity of our cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
