[Beowulf] newbie
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgSat May 2 01:21:49 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] newbie
- Next message: [Beowulf] newbie
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- "Gus Correa" <gus at ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote: > Hi Chris, list Hiya, > Thanks for the info! Not a problem! > I have been blindly using "-march=amdfam10" (and -O3) > out of the gcc 4.1.2 man page, simply because it is > recommended for Barcelona (and hopefully also the > Shanghais we have). Well I did a microbenchmark beforehand (actually one from Joe Landman's blog) and found that the Barcelona extensions improved performance for it: http://www.csamuel.org/2009/03/15/comparing-fortran-compilers but that doesn't seem to carry over into the code our users are trying with it (possibly because they're not doing Fortran). So I would strongly suggest benchmarking your code both with and without that option and see what works best for you! > What would be the right level of optimization then? As ever, the answer is "it depends". :-) Experiment and read the info pages for the optimisation flags in GCC.. [Intel and Shanghai] > Is this deliberate? In the sense that they have no desire to support competitors hardware, yes. Not really surprising, if AMD made compilers I doubt they'd try and do Intel specific optimisations either.. cheers! Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
- Previous message: [Beowulf] newbie
- Next message: [Beowulf] newbie
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
