[Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Craig Tierney Craig.Tierney at noaa.govFri Mar 27 10:20:03 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joshua mora acosta wrote: > The only way I got under 1usec in PingPong test or with > ib_[write/send/read]_lat is with QDR and back to back (ie. no switch). > With switch I get 1.1[3-7]usec [HP-MPI, OpenMPI, MVAPICH]. > It does not matter the MPI although I have to agree with Greg that multirail > also increases latency. > Multirail is used for: > i) reliability > ii) higher bandwidth > > Best regards, > Joshua > What about using multi-rail to increase message rate? That isn't the same as latency, but if you put messages on both wires you should get more. A vendor tried to convince me recently that this was important, but they had no benchmarks to back it up. Craig > > ------ Original Message ------ > Received: 11:11 PM CDT, 03/26/2009 > From: Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> > To: beowulf at beowulf.org > Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB? > >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:32:23PM -0400, Dow Hurst DPHURST wrote: >> >>> We've got a couple of weeks max to finalize spec'ing a new cluster. Has > >>> anyone knowledge of lowering latency for NAMD by implementing a >>> multi-rail IB solution using MVAPICH or Intel's MPI? >> Multi-rail is likely to increase latency. >> >> BTW, Intel MPI usually has higher latency than other MPI >> implementations. >> >> If you look around for benchmarks you'll find that QLogic InfiniPath >> does quite well on NAMD and friends, compared to that other brand of >> InfiniBand adaptor. For example, at >> >> http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/performance.html >> >> the lowest line == best performance is InfiniPath. Those results >> aren't the most recent, but I'd bet that the current generation of >> adaptors has the same situation. >> >> -- Greg >> (yeah, I used to work for QLogic.) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -- Craig Tierney (craig.tierney at noaa.gov)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Lowered latency with multi-rail IB?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
